The Legal Foundation
To understand Go Topless Day, one must first understand the legal landscape it protests. The event’s origins are deeply rooted in a fundamental question: If a man can legally be shirtless in public to cool down on a hot day, why can’t a woman?
For decades, the answer was rooted in outdated "indecency" laws that specifically criminalised the female nipple. These laws were rarely challenged, accepted as a simple fact of life, a reflection of "public morality." But in 1992, New York State’s highest court delivered a landmark ruling that would become the movement’s cornerstone across the U.S. and Canada
The case, People v. Santorelli, involved a group of women who were arrested for appearing topless in a public park as a protest. The Court of Appeals of New York ruled that the state’s law prohibiting women from exposing their breasts was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court found that the law was not applied equally — it targeted women specifically — and that the government’s stated interest in preserving "public order" was not sufficient to justify this gender-based discrimination. In essence, the court declared that the female breast was not, in and of itself, an obscene or inherently sexual object. The law, it ruled, was unconstitutional.
This was a monumental victory. It established a legal precedent that in New York State, and by extension anywhere with similar constitutional protections, women had the same right as men to be top-free in public. However, a legal right on paper is not the same as a right exercised freely in practice. While the law changed in New York and a handful of other states and cities that followed its lead, the social and cultural stigma did not.
This is the critical gap that Go Topless Day seeks to highlight. The event, founded in 2007, uses the anniversary of this legal victory to ask a simple, powerful question: We have the right, so why can’t we use it without fear?
The double standard is glaring. A man’s bare chest is neutral, even mundane. It is seen as practical, non-sexual, and unremarkable. A woman’s bare chest, however, is hyper-sexualized, politicized, and deemed obscene. It is considered an invitation for public commentary, harassment, and even violence. This discrepancy reveals that the issue is not about nudity itself, but about the specific cultural meaning we assign to the female body. The law in some places may have caught up, but our collective psyche has not.
The Inextricable Link to Women’s Equality Day
The timing of Go Topless Day is its most brilliant and misunderstood strategic element. It is held on the Sunday nearest to August 26th for a powerful reason: that date is Women’s Equality Day.
Women’s Equality Day commemorates the certification of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on August 26, 1920, which granted (some) women the right to vote. It is a day to celebrate a hard-won victory in the long struggle for gender equality. But it is also a day to reflect on the work that remains. The right to vote was a crucial step, but it was not the finish line. True equality encompasses economic parity, freedom from violence, reproductive rights, and, fundamentally, bodily autonomy.
Go Topless Day activists argue that the control over one’s own body is the most basic form of autonomy. If a woman does not have sovereignty over her own physical form, how can she claim to be truly equal in any other sphere of life? The protest directly ties the symbolic act of top-freedom to this core principle. By defiantly claiming a legal right that cultural shame still denies them, participants are embodying the next frontier of the equality fight.
They are making the argument that equality is not just about what you can do (vote, work, own property) but also about who you can be in public space without fear of reprisal. It challenges the notion that women’s bodies are public property, subject to constant scrutiny, regulation, and judgment. In this sense, Go Topless Day is a direct, physical continuation of the spirit of Women’s Equality Day. It says, "We won the right to participate in democracy, and now we are fighting for the right to exist in our own skin, freely and without shame."
Deconstructing the "Distraction" and "Indecency" Arguments
The most common criticisms levelled against Go Topless Day are that it is a "distraction" from more serious feminist issues and that it is simply "indecent." These criticisms deserve to be unpacked, as they often serve to shut down the conversation the event is trying to start.
1. "It’s a distraction from real issues like the pay gap or reproductive rights."
This argument creates a false hierarchy of oppression. It suggests that fights for equality must be waged one issue at a time and that bodily autonomy is somehow less important than economic autonomy. In reality, these issues are deeply intertwined. The sexualisation and objectification of the female body are directly linked to why women are often not taken seriously in the workplace, why their pain is dismissed by doctors, and why legislation controlling their reproductive choices is so pervasive.
The mindset that says a female nipple is obscene is the same mindset that says a woman’s professional ambition is "unseemly" or that her medical decisions should be made by lawmakers. Challenging one helps to challenge the other. Furthermore, the pay gap is a complex, systemic issue fought in boardrooms and legislatures, often out of the public eye. Go Topless Day, by its very nature, is a highly visible, grassroots action that forces the public to confront its biases head-on. It is a different tactic for the same war.
2. "It’s indecent and inappropriate for children."
This argument is perhaps the most revealing. It hinges on the unexamined assumption that the female body is inherently sexual and therefore inherently inappropriate. Children do not naturally see a bare chest as sexual; they are taught that it is. They see their mothers’ bodies as sources of comfort and nourishment. The "think of the children" argument is often a proxy for adult discomfort. It projects adult sexualisation onto a child’s neutral gaze.
The protest challenges us to ask: Why is a man’s chest "family-friendly" but a woman’s is not? What are we actually teaching our children when we enforce this double standard? We are teaching them that women’s bodies are shameful, that they must be hidden and controlled, and that they exist primarily for the male gaze. Go Topless Day advocates argue for a world where all bodies are de-sexualised and neutralized in non-intimate contexts, creating a healthier and less objectifying environment for everyone, including children.
A Global Movement with Local Challenges
The fight for top-free equality is not confined to the United States. It is a global issue, with varying levels of acceptance and legal standing. In much of Europe, top-free sunbathing is common and uncontroversial. In other parts of the world, any public display of skin is heavily restricted by law and custom.
This global perspective further highlights that the issue is cultural, not natural. There is no biological reason for the taboo; it is a social construct. Go Topless Day, therefore, becomes a fascinating case study in how laws and cultural norms interact. It demonstrates that winning a legal battle is only half the fight. The much harder work is changing hearts and minds, dismantling centuries of ingrained conditioning that tells women their bodies are objects of sin, shame, or desire, rather than simply their own.
More Than a Day; A Demand for Bodily Sovereignty
Go Topless Day is often misunderstood because it operates on a level deeper than polite discourse. It is a physical, visceral protest. It uses the body itself as the argument. It forces a confrontation not through reasoned debate alone, but by making the inequality visible, tangible, and impossible to ignore.
It is easy to support equality in the abstract. It is harder to confront the specific, uncomfortable ways in which we are all complicit in upholding inequality. The instinct to look away, to feel awkward, to dismiss the protesters as "crazy" or "attention-seeking" is precisely the instinct the event is designed to provoke. That discomfort is the point. It is the sound of deep-seated cultural norms being challenged.
On its surface, Go Topless Day is about the right to be bare-chested. But it is about more than just breasts. It is about the right to personal autonomy. It is about challenging the patriarchal control of the female body. It is about demanding that women be seen as full human beings, not as collections of sexualized parts that require regulation.
By tying itself to Women’s Equality Day, it issues a bold challenge: Let’s not just celebrate the equality we’ve won in the past. Let’s get serious about winning the equality we still lack. Let’s create a world where the human body, in all its forms, is free from shame, where laws are applied equally, and where a woman’s right to exist in public space is not contingent on how much of her skin she chooses to cover. That is a message worth taking seriously, with or without a shirt on.
No comments:
Post a Comment